🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers recognizing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of commenters applauding your advice on growing your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

If not, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Numerous women joined an organized LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts suggested that changing their gender to "male" boosted their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their professional summaries to include what they called "bro-coded" language - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who use online business jargon.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which posts are shown to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when determining content distribution. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her audience decline significantly.

The Process

• First, she modified her gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she repurposed previous content with similar "agentic" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Although the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Before, my posts were softer - concise and clever, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after one week, saying "Every day I continued, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants experienced favorable results. Cass Cooper who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "white" reported a reduction in visibility and interaction.

"We understand there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently caused female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in informal experiments where identical posts by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."