Will McLaren Keep Playing Fair and Stop Max Verstappen? - Formula 1 Q&A
The Red Bull team's driver Max Verstappen reduced the gap in the drivers' championship by winning both the sprint race and feature races at the US Grand Prix.
Lando Norris finished in second position on race day to cut Oscar Piastri's points advantage to 14 points with five races remaining.
Four-times world champion Verstappen is now just forty points behind Piastri approaching this upcoming Mexico City Grand Prix.
Must McLaren Accept Reality of F1 - That if You Want Win, You Can't Always Be Fair?
McLaren are well aware of the challenge they confront with Verstappen and the Red Bull team in the drivers' championship this year, but they don't believe to change their method to running the team.
They will continue to provide their two drivers the optimal opportunity they can and run the team on a foundation of equity and equanimity.
"This represents the manner we intend competing. This is the method in which we tackle competition, and we want to remain fair, and we intend to maintain equal treatment to both drivers."
Team principal Andrea Stella is a seasoned expert of numerous title battles. He claimed the title as race engineer to Kimi Raikkonen in the 2007 season when the Ferrari racer recovered seventeen points under the old scoring system in two Grands Prix to secure the championship, while the McLaren team collapsed.
And he lost the title as race engineer to Fernando Alonso in 2010, when Ferrari made errors in their race strategy at the last Grand Prix of the championship and enabled Vettel and Red Bull to snatch the championship from their grasp.
Andrea Stella commented after the race in Texas: "We view the next five races as chances to increase the gap on Verstappen. And when it involves having to make a call as to a driver, this will only be led by mathematics."
"We rely on the past experience. I can recall at least 2007, 2010, in which you go to the final Grand Prix and it's actually the [driver in] third [place] that claims the championship. So we're not going to make decisions unless this is closed by the calculations."
Why Did McLaren Cease Upgrades on The Current Car?
All teams this year have had to face the dilemma of how long to focus on their 2025 season car while also ensuring they are as prepared as they can be for the significant regulation change scheduled for the 2026 season.
In Formula 1, it's typically the case that if a team gets it wrong at the beginning of a new regulation period, it can take a considerable period to recover. And if they get it right, that advantage can continue for some time - look at the Red Bull team in 2022 and 2023, the most recent occasion the rules changed.
The McLaren team started this season with the best car, after putting a lot of innovation into their 2025 season design.
They did continue to develop it for a while, but were experiencing reduced benefits. So when evaluating the value for money they were achieving on their 2025 car compared to 2026, it became an easy decision to switch focus to the following season.
The Red Bull team have caught up since introducing their updated floor and front wing at the Italian Grand Prix, but the McLaren stays competitive - team boss Andrea Stella said he believed Norris had the speed to compete for the win in Austin had he not ended up behind Leclerc.
"We just have to keep optimising the car performance and keep executing strong race weekends. And from this perspective, if you think of a race like Baku City Circuit, we failed to optimize the performance and we didn't deliver a perfect race."
"Therefore we have a large opportunity, and the result of this championship and the driver's title is in our control. It's not placed in someone else's hands."
Team Changes: How Challenging Is It to Change Constructors?
First of all, I'm not sure the inquiry has an completely correct premise. It's true that each of Lewis Hamilton and Sainz had somewhat difficult opening phases of the championship, in different ways, and that they are now faring significantly improved.
Carlos Sainz and Albon do now appear very even. However, it's not so clear that, in Hamilton's case, he is yet the "match" of Charles Leclerc - or not regularly, at least.
Hamilton has not beaten Charles Leclerc very often at all this year, either in qualifying sessions or Grand Prix.
He is now much closer than he was. He is regularly setting times within a few hundredths of a second of Leclerc, but in qualifying battles it's 4-2 to Charles Leclerc since the mid-season break.
This last weekend in Texas, on one of Lewis Hamilton's preferred tracks, he was a full second behind his teammate when the Monaco driver completed his pit stop, and dropped 13 seconds over the remaining portion of the Grand Prix.
Looking back, Charles Leclerc was on the optimal race strategy. Regardless, over the season, and even now, it's hard to argue that on balance Charles Leclerc has hasn't been the better Ferrari racer this year.
Both Hamilton and Sainz have discussed how difficult it is to change constructors, and we have to take them at their word.
Lewis Hamilton would not say even currently that he was completely adjusted to Ferrari - and he is expecting the new rules next season will suit him; he has never really enjoyed these venturi cars.
There is a great deal for a driver to understand and adapt to when they change constructors, as Hamilton has explained repeatedly this year. But not all faces difficulties in this way.
Alonso, for example, was on it from the start of the 2023 season when he transferred to Aston Martin. And would Max Verstappen struggle if he changed constructors? I suspect the majority in Formula 1 would anticipate he wouldn't.
When Will We Know Next Year's Team Performance?
Before the F1 cars run for the initial time in winter testing next season, no-one will know how the teams are looking next year.
The first test, in Catalunya on 26-30 January, is behind closed doors because the teams wanted to understand their first running of the new engines without the prying eyes of the press.
So the two tests in Sakhir on February 11-13 and February 18-20 will be the first time some kind of indication of relative performance becomes apparent.
But, as always, it's not until the first race that the true and accurate picture will emerge.